Talk:Il secondo libro de motetti a cinque voci (Giaches de Wert)

Hi Claude, I cannot understand why was it necessary to add another table listing the same works once more. And this (redundant) list contains a lot of redundant information. In the description it is stated that these are all motets (therefore Sacred), they are all for 5 voices, they are all published in 1581. Why listing this again? Anyway, from the list it is also absolutely clear which works are available in CPDL, from the colour of the link. If the link is red, the piece is not available, if the link is blue (or purple) then the piece is available in CPDL. I do not know what purpose this new table serve other than making the page ugly. Imruska (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Imre. I agree that the results, in this case, aren't so useful (many redundant information). The pros can be seen if you just edit the page. You will see only one short quarter of line for a 42 lines table on Motectorum pro festis totius anni (Luca Marenzio). Be aware that such tables will be automatically completed if each 'Published' line is correctly filled on each present or future work page. No more table to sketch line by line in the future! It's easy to see inconsistent data from works gathered in the table. Moreover, I'm ready to revert my edits. But let's discuss that in the forums with other admins and users. Claude (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)