Talk:Sacrae cantiones I (Carlo Gesualdo): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Wasn't there some talk about a 'large work' page for masses, cantatas and the like? It would seem this sort of collection would qualify for that sort of list. How far are we on that? Cordially, [[User:Jkelecom|joachim]] 02:50, 13 February 2008 (PST) | :Wasn't there some talk about a 'large work' page for masses, cantatas and the like? It would seem this sort of collection would qualify for that sort of list. How far are we on that? Cordially, [[User:Jkelecom|joachim]] 02:50, 13 February 2008 (PST) | ||
This is only a collection of motets, but no "large work". It should be formatted like most other collections in CPDL. | |||
[[User:The law|The law]] 18:02, 13 February 2008 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 02:02, 14 February 2008
If this is intended to be a page containing pointers to 19 individual works, shouldn't this page be implemented as a "category:" page? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peftypefty (talk • contribs) on 13:59, 12 February 2008.
- Generally, we haven't used categories for work collections on CPDL, it has just been a static list because the list for a musical collection won't change so links are added manually. If you think there's a case for creating a new category, do explain the reason here. Regards --Bobnotts talk 09:01, 12 February 2008 (PST)
- Wasn't there some talk about a 'large work' page for masses, cantatas and the like? It would seem this sort of collection would qualify for that sort of list. How far are we on that? Cordially, joachim 02:50, 13 February 2008 (PST)
This is only a collection of motets, but no "large work". It should be formatted like most other collections in CPDL.
The law 18:02, 13 February 2008 (PST)