User talk:CHGiffen

From Thursday 17 July through Tuesday 22 July, I will be away
most of the time in Madison, Wisconsin.
If there is something important, please leave a message here on my talk page,
and I will try to attend to it as soon as possible.

Welcome to the User talk page of CHGiffen,
alias Charles H. Giffen or simply Chuck_talk Giffen_♫.

Feel free to leave questions and comments on this page about any contributions I've made to CPDL as a wiki editor/administrator.

• Comments and questions about scores I have edited for CPDL should be posted on my contributor talk page.
• Comments and questions about my compositions should be posted on my composer talk page.

You may also contact me (1) on the CPDL Bulletin Board, username: CHGiffen or (2) via e-mail: chg4k AT yahoo DOT com (with " AT " and " DOT " replaced by "@" and "." respectively).

Please use my talk page in the following manner:

• start new discussions by clicking on the "+" tab to the right of the "edit" at the top of this page or click here,
• continue discussions by clicking on the "edit" link directly right of the appropriate title below,
• and always sign your posts by typing four tildes afterwards (~~~~).

I will try to respond to your messages in a timely manner.

If you have left a message on this page, I will reply here unless you request that I reply on your talk page. Because of this, you may find it useful to temporarily watch this page.

If I have left a message for you on your talk page, please reply there. I will have your talk page on my watch list, and I watch the recent changes as well, so I'll see your message anyway. The reason for this is to keep the discussion together. Thank you for your co-operation!

Archives

• Archive 1, Jul 2007 - Sep 2007
• Archive 2, Oct 2007 - Dec 2007
• Archive 3, Jan 2008 - Mar 2008
• Archive 4, Apr 2008 - Jun 2008

Template:NewWork

Hi Chuck. Your recent edits to the above template seem to have messed it up so I've reverted them for the moment. I figured on a template so widely used, it was best to revert even for the short term. Cheers --Bobnotts talk 00:21, 1 July 2008 (PDT)

Hi Rob. Thanks for reverting the template. I had noticed something was wrong this morning when one goes to, say Category:2008-06-30, and I had finally tracked it down to Template:NewWork, but didn't have time to finish straightening things out. It all seems to have stemmed from an attempt to add a sortkey 9, which was botched (and probably not necessary, although the intent was to have say "The Haven" sort under "Haven, The"). I'll think about it later. -- Chuck_talk Giffen_♫ 04:16, 1 July 2008 (PDT)

Hi Chuck, please have a look at a test I am doing with this template to make it date-conditional. I made use of another template named IsNew that tests the passed parameter date against a range of dates and returns "yes" or "no" as the answer. It's in fact a very simple and, unfortunately, non-automated template, but which has the advantage of being backward-compatible, since it accepts as parameter a date in the format yyyy-mm-dd. The negative part is that it would require a monthly maintenance in order to add/remove one month from each extremity of the test values. It is set now to answer "yes" to dates ranging from 2008-07-31 to one year back. I suppose you'd like to extend it to two years, if it gets approved by you and Rob. --Carlos ^huh? 04:34, 12 July 2008 (PDT)

Hi Carlos. I thought about using almost exactly such coding as in Template:IsNew, but felt that the necessity of maintaining the template every month, more-or-less, would put yet another burden on the admins, amd I suppose I was hoping that we could implement something that was backward-compatible, even though it might require another parameter, which would at least take effect down the road. The advantage of the IsNew mechanism is that it immediately takes care of the stale NewWork icons and listing. I guess it's a question of trade-offs, and I'm inclined to leave your coding intact, at least for the present, and wait for others to weigh in on the mattter. -- Chuck_talk Giffen_♫ 22:12, 12 July 2008 (PDT)

Hi Chuck, I know this is not what we both had in mind, but given the lack of functionality of this wiki instalation, that's perhaps the only option we have, though we can keep trying to find a better solution anyway. At least the maintenance will be restricted to just one page instead of all the old score pages. :) --Carlos ^huh? 03:04, 13 July 2008 (PDT)

Alto clef for awkward work...

		The Alto Clef award
		for techie work essential to the functioning of CPDL is hereby awarded to Chuck Giffen for regular improvements and additions to the templates used on CPDL which allow it to function so well. — Bobnotts talk 23:54, 1 July 2008 (PDT)

Oh, wow, thank you, Rob! And I had hoped (or envisioned) the A in alto might stand for "altruism" ... but I quite relish your take on it! Again, many thanks. -- Chuck_talk Giffen_♫ 23:58, 1 July 2008 (PDT)

Ha ha - I like "awkward work" because I remember learning to read the alto clef for my grade 5 theory exam and thinking "why on earth would anyone want to use this clef?". So, an award for complicated work executed precisely (not a comment on the awardee's character!) Do you think it's worth making these awards into templates? I don't expect they'll get used that often but it might be worth it. I could do it if you're busy... --Bobnotts talk 00:44, 2 July 2008 (PDT)

I did have in mind setting up some award templates when I uploaded the various clef images, and maybe a page that describes them, with recommendations as to using them, with links to the templates. Now that someone else thinks it might be a good idea, I think we can get to work on it (although it's not a high priority item), cribbing from the Wikipedia barnstars treatment. -- Chuck_talk Giffen_♫ 01:30, 2 July 2008 (PDT)

Iñigo Igualador compositions

Hi Chuck, have you seen the scores uploaded by User:Desconocido? (whose name, by the way, is Spanish for "Unknown"). They have a copyright notice that reads: © Ed. "El Sanedrín - PANDERGÓ" S.L - Queda prohibida toda copia y/o reproducción de esta partitura sin permiso expreso del editor (Prohibited any copy and/or reproduction of this score without express authorization of the editor). Would it be the case to delete them? Unless of course "Desconocido" is the composer himself, but how can we know it for sure? Just asking him? --Carlos ^huh? 08:17, 21 July 2008 (PDT)