User talk:DfcDresden: Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "===Welcome and...=== Welcome and thanks for submitting and posting your editions. One minor point: new editions should be posted first (i.e. in reverse chronological order), and...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===Welcome and...===
===Welcome and...===
Welcome and thanks for submitting and posting your editions.  One minor point: new editions should be posted first (i.e. in reverse chronological order), and even if it is an edition of a work already available at {{CPDL}}, you should include the {{CiteTemp|NewWork}} template.  If you need any help, just let me know.  Thanks again! &ndash; [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]]&nbsp;[[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 13:37, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
Welcome and thanks for submitting and posting your editions.  One minor point: new editions should be posted first (i.e. in reverse chronological order), and even if it is an edition of a work already available at {{CPDL}}, you should include the {{CiteTemp|NewWork}} template.  If you need any help, just let me know.  Thanks again! &ndash; [[User:CHGiffen|Chuck]][[User talk:CHGiffen|<sub><small>'''talk'''</small></sub>]]&nbsp;[[User:Charles H. Giffen|Giffen]][[Charles H. Giffen|<sub>'''♫'''</sub>]] 13:37, 23 October 2011 (CDT)
* Ah ok, thanks for that hint. Does someone later removes that NewWork template stuff? --[[User:DfcDresden|DfcDresden]] 13:45, 23 October 2011 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:45, 23 October 2011

Welcome and...

Welcome and thanks for submitting and posting your editions. One minor point: new editions should be posted first (i.e. in reverse chronological order), and even if it is an edition of a work already available at CPDL, you should include the NewWork template. If you need any help, just let me know. Thanks again! – Chucktalk Giffen 13:37, 23 October 2011 (CDT)

  • Ah ok, thanks for that hint. Does someone later removes that NewWork template stuff? --DfcDresden 13:45, 23 October 2011 (CDT)