Talk:Da bei rami scendea (Jacques Arcadelt): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Carlos moveu a página Talk:Da bei rami scendea (Philippe de Monte) para Talk:Da bei rami scendea (Jacques Arcadelt): see talk page) |
m (Text replace - "Walkertron5000" to "Wboyle") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I believe it is fairly undisputedly considered to be an Arcadelt piece, simply misattributed in the manuscript this was transcribed from. See [http://www.rism.org.uk/manuscripts/119549]. Can we get it moved to the correct composer page? Thanks, | I believe it is fairly undisputedly considered to be an Arcadelt piece, simply misattributed in the manuscript this was transcribed from. See [http://www.rism.org.uk/manuscripts/119549]. Can we get it moved to the correct composer page? Thanks, | ||
[[User: | [[User:Wboyle|Wboyle]] ([[User talk:Wboyle|talk]]) 05:26, 19 August 2012 (CDT) | ||
:Hi Walter, the information on your link is also confirmed by the Grove Dictionary. I'll make the necessary corrections, thanks. —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] ([[User talk:Carlos|talk]]) 14:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | :Hi Walter, the information on your link is also confirmed by the Grove Dictionary. I'll make the necessary corrections, thanks. —[[User:Carlos|Carlos]] ([[User talk:Carlos|talk]]) 14:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:49, 5 May 2014
I believe it is fairly undisputedly considered to be an Arcadelt piece, simply misattributed in the manuscript this was transcribed from. See [1]. Can we get it moved to the correct composer page? Thanks, Wboyle (talk) 05:26, 19 August 2012 (CDT)